Religious Tolerance and Intolerance: Religion Toleration Meaning

1 Comments
Join the Conversation
World Religions Have Done Good and Evil in World - cohdra
World Religions Have Done Good and Evil in World - cohdra
What is religious tolerance and intolerance? Politics and point of view are the biggest factors influencing definition of religion toleration and its value.

Religious tolerance is a politically charged concept. Political correctness usually dictates that all religions should be tolerated. However, for many people, the idea of accepting all religions is a point of contention because they argue that not all systems of belief are worthy of toleration.

What Exactly Does Religious Tolerance Mean?

In its broadest sense, religious tolerance means recognition and open-mindedness towards various religious beliefs.

ReligiousTolerance.org makes an important point about the definition of religious tolerance, which the site defines as “allowing followers of other religions to follow their spiritual beliefs without oppression or discrimination... Tolerance may not necessarily extend beyond religious beliefs to include some religious actions – particularly those that harm or harass others.”

The tolerance website spotlights the murky gray area in the acceptance of religions and hints at a fundamental dilemma – beliefs and actions of religions are often difficult to differentiate and separate.

Examples of Difficult Religion Toleration Issues

There are many continuing in-the-news topics that underscore the difficulty people are having figuring out how to accept religions and struggling with knowing if intolerance of some religions is warranted in certain circumstances. The following highlight some of the difficulties.

Islam Tolerance and Intolerance

In 2010, the Ground Zero Mosque controversy in New York City was one of the most reported-on news stories. Some Americans feel that building an Islamic center so near to the site of the September 11th terrorist attacks is insensitive and should be stopped. Other Americans point out that the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of religion is a paramount American value and, accordingly, support the construction of the Muslim center.

During this same period, Europeans have struggled with the question of Islam tolerance on the continent. The Swiss passed a ban on the building of minarets on mosques, and the French passed a ban on Muslim women’s wearing of the burqa.

Ban supporters argue that Islam is a radical religion that condones terrorism and threatens Europeans’ identity, while opponents counter that the bans are clear evidence of religious persecution and intolerance.

Conservative and Liberal Christianity

Currently, one of the most pronounced splits in Christianity is over conservative vs. liberal practices. Some of the most controversial topics being debated have to do with women’s place in the leadership of the church and the acceptance of gays in the church.

Conservative and liberal Christian denominations have clashed over beliefs and practices. In many progressive churches, women have made headway in becoming active leaders in congregations and homosexual members have been accepted and embraced. See article Rev. Barbie Promotes Women Leaders in Episcopal Church for further reading on this topic.

Many conservative churches continue to fight against what they see as sinful and misguided encroachments on traditional religious beliefs and values. See article the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints’ Opposition to Gay Marriage and Pro-Choice Catholic Politicians Clash with Roman Catholic Church for examples.

Atheists vs. Believers

Some atheists and others who do not subscribe to a particular religion bring into question whether religions, in fact, deserve tolerance. They point to the atrocities done in the name of religion, including discrimination and persecution against people outside of particular faiths, and argue that society would be better off without religion.

Some non-believers point out that religious tolerance is unwarranted and undeserved since examples of religious intolerance throughout history and today abound. See article Bible, Quran, and Book of Mormon Swap for Porn and blog post Are Atheists Angry? to read about atheist activism against religions.

The Ideal of Tolerating Religions

Religious tolerance is an ideal of many societies, but in practice many people find that they actually do not agree with the concept. The reasons for their misgivings about tolerating different belief systems are varied. Some are opposed to religion toleration because they do not agree with the morals and values of particular belief systems and believe that certain religions are corrupting society. Others view some religions as intolerant and as promoting hateful practices and thus unworthy of toleration.

In short, the meaning and value of religious tolerance and open-mindedness toward different belief systems is different for different people and depends on point of view. For an interesting illustration of this point, see conservative blogger Kurt Schlichter's post titled “Coexist?”: You First criticizing the popularity of the coexist bumper sticker.

Sources:

BigPeace.com, “Coexist?”: You First. Retrieved December 6, 2010.

ReligiousTolerance.org, Religious Tolerance and Cooperation. Retrieved December 5, 2010.

Aimee Larsen Stoddard, by writer

Aimee Larsen Stoddard - Aimee is a professional writer/editor. She has a BA in English and is currently completing an MS in Theology.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 4+9?

Comments

Dec 13, 2010 8:30 PM
Guest :
First, one must realize that there was once a time before anyone had the need for a god of any sort. There are scientists who believe that the need for a superior power came about as humankind was from a hunter-gather society, it could have occurred after a long hunt for, let's say, a deer, probably causing the gatherer to go into delirum from hunger and exhaustion. Finally, when the deer is killed, it is so long from where the chase began that they then believed some power delivered their game to them, hence, the myth of a God who took charge of their fate through cooperation, then it became the norm. During evolution of humankind into modern "man", there was a point in time where the mind we now have was only instinctive, later developing into consciousness. For instance, Moses is considered to have received the Law. Most historians do not believe this, because when the evolution of consciousness timeline is dropped over where humankind was in neural development to appreciate whether there would be the understanding or need for Laws to control behavior, humankind did not have a developed mind (soul - entire mind - Superconsciousness, Conscious and Subconscious phases). They know that during Moses' time, humankind was only operating in a highly instinctive mode, not a cultivated mind as a result of evolution in consciousness.

It might be interesting to take a course in Introduction to World Religions or Phenomenology of Religions. You would be surprised. Imagination-wise, Stephen Speilberg does not have anything on those who derived such an understanding of a god and after-life as so many of those religions did. It is AAAAAA-MAZING!!!!
1
Advertisement
Advertisement