Was Charles Darwin an Atheist? — Darwin's Religious Beliefs & God

2 Comments
Join the Conversation
Charles Darwin Was an Agnostic, Not an Atheist - Karl Pearson
Charles Darwin Was an Agnostic, Not an Atheist - Karl Pearson
Though Christian throughout his life, find out how agnostic Charles Darwin's ideas about religion, God, and meaning were colored by his theory of evolution.

The debate between creationists and evolutionists has become so heated that many people assume that Charles Darwin, who was one of the first scientists to propose the theory of evolution, was an atheist. Yet Darwin was primarily an agnostic, struggling for much of his life with what he believed about God.

“In my most extreme fluctuations,” wrote Charles Darwin towards the end of his life in a letter quoted in the Times Online, “I have never been an atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God.”

Charles Darwin’s Religious Upbringing

Though Charles Darwin’s family was Unitarian and many were freethinkers, Darwin himself received a traditional religious upbringing in many ways. Darwin was baptized into the Church of England and received an Anglican religious education.

Darwin later attended the University of Edinburgh and University of Cambridge. He first studied to become a doctor like his father, but then decided he wanted to enter the priesthood and thus earned a degree in theology. While in school, Darwin discovered his interest in the natural sciences as well, which determined the course of his life.

Charles Darwin’s Experience on the Beagle

According to the Cambridge University Library, a major event — perhaps the defining moment — in Charles Darwin’s life occurred when his friend John Stevens Henslow, a botany professor, recommended that Darwin accompany Commander Robert Fitzroy on the five-year voyage of the HMS Beagle around the world.

While sailing on the Beagle, Darwin espoused orthodox religious views. He frequently quoted the Bible as the literal truth and as a guide for morality, but by the end of the trip, Darwin’s religious views had begun to change.

According to AboutDarwin.com, Darwin was deeply impacted by slavery on board the Beagle and the general suffering of people and other living things in the world that he saw. Darwin began to question the nature of God who allowed such suffering.

Evolution of Charles Darwin’s Religious Beliefs

After returning from the Beagle voyage, Charles Darwin relinquished his intention to become a priest and instead became engaged in research into the origin of species. As Darwin discovered more about the adaptation of species to their environment through struggle for survival, natural selection, and evolution, he started to further question traditional religious beliefs.

Darwin had trouble reconciling traditional notions of God with what he witnessed in the natural world. Darwin was troubled by his knowledge of how brutal life was, marked foremost by a violent struggle for survival, which resulted in the survival of only the fittest species. Darwin wondered what kind of God would devise such a system.

James Moore, Charles Darwin biographer, commented in an interview with Speaking of Faith host, Krista Tippett, “There was something deep inside Darwin that wanted to bring people face to face with the appalling depths of nature – that it produces morality, nature, but it’s not a moral place.”

The Christian Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin remained a Christian throughout his life, though not a practicing one later in life. As depicted in the 2009 movie Creation, the death of Darwin’s beloved 10-year-old daughter Annie, in addition to what he knew of how nature operates, caused him to lose faith in a benevolent God and stop attending church with his family.

However, it is important to note that Darwin remained associated with the Church of England throughout his life. Even after he stopped attending church services, he remained a member and financial supporter of St. Mary’s Church in the village of Downe, where he and his family lived. Darwin was given full Christian honors and burial in Westminster Abbey.

The Agnostic Charles Darwin

Charles Darwin’s struggle with God colored his life. Yet he never denied the existence of God, so it is incorrect to label him an atheist. In his letter to John Fordyce quoted in the Times Online, Darwin wrote, “I think that generally (& more and more so as I grow older) but not always, that an agnostic would be the most correct description of my state of mind.”

Nevertheless, Darwin was very mindful of other people’s religious beliefs and despised religious conflict. In fact, Darwin did his best to leave the question of the nature God out of On the Origin of Species and ease the conflict between science and religion he knew the book would foment.

Darwin’s letter to Joseph Hooker, also quoted in the Times Online, perhaps best encapsulates Darwin’s religious views and struggle: "My theology is a simple muddle: I cannot look at the Universe as the result of blind chance, yet I can see no evidence of beneficent Design."

Sources:

Creation movie, CreationTheMovie.com. Released 2009.

Darwin's Religious Odyssey Book Review, EpiscopalChurch.org. Retrieved May 10, 2010.

"God, Evolution and Charles Darwin: Ten Surprising Things Darwin Said About Religious Faith," TimesOnline.co.uk. Retrieved May 10, 2010.

Tippett, Krista. (2010). Einstein's God: Conversations About Science and the Human Spirit. Chapter "Evolution and Wonder," pp. 99-120. New York, NY: Penguin Group.

Aimee Larsen Stoddard, by writer

Aimee Larsen Stoddard - Aimee is a professional writer/editor. She has a BA in English and is currently completing an MS in Theology.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 6+8?

Comments

Aug 29, 2011 11:56 PM
Guest :
There are a few reasons that Charles Darwin's evolution theory could not be accepted:

a) How could human beings be evolved from apes as apes could not converse in human languages?

b) How could human beings be evolved from apes as apes' languages do not sound alike as compared to human languages?

c) How could human beings be evolved from apes as all the voices of apes sound alike and none could be the same as human beings?

d) Some might argue that human beings speak in English languages nowadays differ from one country to another, such as, United Kingdom, Canadia, America, and Australia to prove that languages could be evolving. However, they fail to understand that the reason why English languages have been formed due to they tend to adopt words from foreign languages. Refer to the origin of English as spelt out in the website as follows: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_English_language

This website gives us a clear information that English languages have been formed not because of the evolution of languages but due to they have direct influence from West Germanic.

No matter how languages would have been transformed as a result of the influence of foreign countries, they are stil human languages and none of them would sound like apes.

For instance, if human languages would be evolved from apes' languages, they would do the same to use apes' languages that would be from regions or countries. How could human languages be evolved from apes as none of human beings could speak the same sound as apes? Not only that,all the apes' languages sound alike and none of them sound like human languages.

Let's give you an example. The word, computer, in English has been used in Spanish as, Computadora. In Portuguese, the word, English, has turned up to be computador. When the word, computer, in English has been used in Malay or Indonesian language, it would turn up to be Komputer. Don't we find the similarity among them in writing. They simply borrow words from other countries and modify to be their languages.

Yet apes' languages are entirely different from human beings. None of human beings sound alike as apes, how could human beings be evolved from apes?

No matter how apes' languages differ from one region to another or from one country to another, all the apes sound alike. No matter how human languages differ from one region to another or from one country to another, none of the human languages sound like apes and not even one of their spoken words, sound like apes. How could human beings be evolved from apes?

e) All of the apes have black pupils and none of the apes have green or blue eyes' pupils. Only human beings have green or blue pupils. As none of the apes have green or blue pupils, how could human beings be evolved from apes?

f) If human beings would have been evolved since past, why is it that there seem to be no change in human bodies in the past till now? As there has been no change in human body, how could there be evolution then? Your great grand grand….children will have the same physical bodies as you and there should not be any change in physical bodies even though our technology would have advanced to space.

g) If human beings would be evolving from the time to time, why should there be genes to be inherited in the sense that a person would inherit infirmity , let’s says, cancer or diabetics, to children since their children should always be evolving or improving in health instead of simply inherited with genes?
Sep 19, 2011 1:04 PM
Guest :
A minor but significant point: denial of god is not required for atheism, only a lack of belief. If Darwin did not believe in a god, even if he refused to outright deny the existence of one, then he was an atheist.
2 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement